Singapore: PDPC community consultations open up for use of particular info in AI systems and use of kid’s info

In short

On 18 July 2023, the PDPC issued two public session papers, in search of sights on: (a) the proposed clarifications on how the PDPA applies to the collection and use of personalized data to produce and deploy artificial intelligence (AI) systems that embed equipment studying models employed to make conclusions, recommendations or predictions and (b) the proposed Advisory Rules on the PDPA for children’s personalized facts, masking troubles this kind of as acquiring children’s consent, working with children’s own details and in accordance higher criteria of security to children’s private information.

The issuance of the community session papers signals the PDPC’s continued motivation to encouraging the responsible improvement and adoption of AI technological know-how, and the need to have to defend children specially in a digital natural environment. 

The community consultation files can be accessed in this article and here. Intrigued get-togethers may perhaps submit their sights to the PDPC by 31 August 2023.

The PDPC issued two general public session papers on 18 July 2023.

The 1st relates to the Advisory Tips on the Use of Individual Data in AI Suggestion and Determination Devices underneath the PDPA (“AI Advisory Suggestions“). The AI Advisory Rules make clear how the PDPA applies to the assortment and use of individual info by businesses to establish and deploy programs that embed machine studying styles, which are applied to make decisions autonomously or to assist a human choice-maker via suggestions and predictions.

The AI Advisory Rules depend on the existing notification and accountability obligations to inspire businesses to take added actions in relation to AI techniques. Organizations adopting AI units must contemplate supplying added information on the following in crafting their notifications:

  1. The functionality of their solution that demands selection and processing of individual data (e.g., advice of flicks)
  2. A typical description of sorts of private information that will be collected and processed (e.g., movie viewing heritage)
  3. Rationalization of how the processing of personalized knowledge gathered is appropriate to the product function (e.g., evaluation of users’ viewing history to make motion picture suggestions)
  4. Identification of precise functions of individual details that are additional possible to impact the products aspect (e.g., irrespective of whether a movie was seen fully, seen various periods, etc.)

As for the accountability obligation, the AI Advisory Rules stimulate businesses to present far more data on information high-quality and governance actions taken during AI Technique improvement, only if these types of information is deemed related and doing so does not compromise safety, safety or industrial confidentiality.

The 2nd relates to the Advisory Tips on the PDPA for Children’s Personalized Info, at present contained in Chapter 8 of the PDPC’s Advisory Suggestions on the PDPA for Selected Matters. The public is invited to present feed-back on, among some others, the age threshold on when a baby can give valid consent on their individual behalf, and the adequacy of steps that an organization must choose to make sure increased expectations of defense of children’s private data.

* * * * *

For further details and to talk about what this could possibly signify for you, be sure to get in touch with your common Baker McKenzie contact.

* * * * *

© 2023 Baker & McKenzie.Wong & Leow. All rights reserved. Baker & McKenzie.Wong & Leow is integrated with constrained legal responsibility and is a member organization of Baker & McKenzie Global, a world legislation business with member law firms all over the world. In accordance with the frequent terminology employed in experienced service organizations, reference to a “principal” indicates a person who is a spouse, or equal, in these types of a law business. Likewise, reference to an “office” means an business of any this sort of law agency. This might qualify as “Attorney Advertising” necessitating discover in some jurisdictions. Prior outcomes do not assure a identical final result.